Wednesday, October 26, 2005
David Ray Griffin Concluded that His 9/11 Hypothesis Was Correct.
from Kevin Barrett - Coordinator, MUJCA-NET: http://mujca.com
In two speeches to overflow crowds in New York on Oct 15 and 16, Dr. Griffin, a notable theologian, argued that recently revealed evidence seals the case that the Twin Towers and WTC-7 were destroyed by controlled demolition with explosives. Dr. Griffin concluded, "It is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the destruction of the World Trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated by terrorists within our own government.
Dr. Griffin included excerpts from the firemen's tapes that were recently released as a result of a prolonged court battle led by victim's families represented by attorney Norman Siegel and reported in the NY Times. These tapes contained first person descriptions of the observed 'controlled explosion demolition' of the WTC. He also included statements by many witnesses. These sources gave ample testimony giving evidence of explosions going off in the buildings. A 12 minute film was shown for the audiences, who saw for themselves the undeniable evidence for controlled demolition.
Dr. Griffin listed ten characteristics of the collapses which all indicate that the buildings did not fall due to being struck by planes or the ensuing fires. He explained (#1) the buildings fell suddenly without any indication of collapse. (#2) They fell straight into their own footprint at (#3) free-fall speed, meeting virtually no resistance as they fell--a physical impossibility unless all vertical support was being progressively removed by explosives severing the core columns. (#4) The towers were built to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 and 160 mile per hour winds, and (#5) nothing about the plane crashes or ensuing fires gave any indication of causing the kind of damage that would be necessary to trigger even a partial or progressive collapse, much less the shredding of the buildings into dust and fragments that could drop at free- fall speed.
(#6) The massive core columns--the most significant structural feature of the buildings, whose very existence is denied in the official 9/11 Commission Report--were severed into uniform 30 foot sections, just right for the 30-foot trucks used to remove them quickly before a real investigation could transpire. (#7) There was a volcanic-like dust cloud from the concrete being pulverized, and no physical mechanism other than explosives can begin to explain how (#8) so much of the buildings' concrete was rendered into extremely fine dust.
(#9) The debris was ejected horizontally several hundred feet in huge fan shaped plumes stretching in all directions, with (#10) telltale "squibs" following the path of the explosives downward. Again, these are characteristics of the kind of controlled demolitions that news people and firefighters were describing on the morning of 9/11. And, these are all facts that have been avoided by mainstream and even most of the alternative media.
Skepticism for the official 9/11 account appears to be almost universal among intellectuals who have examined the evidence. Furthermore, there has not yet been a single serious attempt to refute the case developed by Dr. Griffin and other free thinkers as Nafeez Ahmed and Mike Ruppert. As for the general public, polls have shown that a strong majority of Canadians (63%, Toronto Star, May '04) and half of New Yorkers (Zogby, August 2004) agree that top US leaders conspired to murder nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11/01.
According to Griffin, the evidence for this conclusion (that 9/11 was an inside job) has thus far been largely ignored by the mainstream press because "it is far too disturbing to accept that we are subject to a government conspiracy of major proportions". Many believe that revealing it would be so destructive to the American psyche, the American form of government, and global stability that it is better to pretend to believe the official version.
However, Griffin disagreed indicating that the continued rule of those who brought us 9/11 would be far more devastating. As it is, the values of the perpetrators of 9/11 are reflected in the lies to justify the attack on Iraq, the disregard for the environment and the Bill of Rights, the criminal negligence both before and after Katrina, and now the apparent plan not only to weaponize space but also to authorize the use of nuclear weapons in a preemptive strike.
*************************************************************************
from Kevin Barrett - Coordinator, MUJCA-NET: http://mujca.com
In two speeches to overflow crowds in New York on Oct 15 and 16, Dr. Griffin, a notable theologian, argued that recently revealed evidence seals the case that the Twin Towers and WTC-7 were destroyed by controlled demolition with explosives. Dr. Griffin concluded, "It is already possible to know, beyond a reasonable doubt, one very important thing: the destruction of the World Trade Center was an inside job, orchestrated by terrorists within our own government.
Dr. Griffin included excerpts from the firemen's tapes that were recently released as a result of a prolonged court battle led by victim's families represented by attorney Norman Siegel and reported in the NY Times. These tapes contained first person descriptions of the observed 'controlled explosion demolition' of the WTC. He also included statements by many witnesses. These sources gave ample testimony giving evidence of explosions going off in the buildings. A 12 minute film was shown for the audiences, who saw for themselves the undeniable evidence for controlled demolition.
Dr. Griffin listed ten characteristics of the collapses which all indicate that the buildings did not fall due to being struck by planes or the ensuing fires. He explained (#1) the buildings fell suddenly without any indication of collapse. (#2) They fell straight into their own footprint at (#3) free-fall speed, meeting virtually no resistance as they fell--a physical impossibility unless all vertical support was being progressively removed by explosives severing the core columns. (#4) The towers were built to withstand the impact of a Boeing 707 and 160 mile per hour winds, and (#5) nothing about the plane crashes or ensuing fires gave any indication of causing the kind of damage that would be necessary to trigger even a partial or progressive collapse, much less the shredding of the buildings into dust and fragments that could drop at free- fall speed.
(#6) The massive core columns--the most significant structural feature of the buildings, whose very existence is denied in the official 9/11 Commission Report--were severed into uniform 30 foot sections, just right for the 30-foot trucks used to remove them quickly before a real investigation could transpire. (#7) There was a volcanic-like dust cloud from the concrete being pulverized, and no physical mechanism other than explosives can begin to explain how (#8) so much of the buildings' concrete was rendered into extremely fine dust.
(#9) The debris was ejected horizontally several hundred feet in huge fan shaped plumes stretching in all directions, with (#10) telltale "squibs" following the path of the explosives downward. Again, these are characteristics of the kind of controlled demolitions that news people and firefighters were describing on the morning of 9/11. And, these are all facts that have been avoided by mainstream and even most of the alternative media.
Skepticism for the official 9/11 account appears to be almost universal among intellectuals who have examined the evidence. Furthermore, there has not yet been a single serious attempt to refute the case developed by Dr. Griffin and other free thinkers as Nafeez Ahmed and Mike Ruppert. As for the general public, polls have shown that a strong majority of Canadians (63%, Toronto Star, May '04) and half of New Yorkers (Zogby, August 2004) agree that top US leaders conspired to murder nearly 3,000 Americans on 9/11/01.
According to Griffin, the evidence for this conclusion (that 9/11 was an inside job) has thus far been largely ignored by the mainstream press because "it is far too disturbing to accept that we are subject to a government conspiracy of major proportions". Many believe that revealing it would be so destructive to the American psyche, the American form of government, and global stability that it is better to pretend to believe the official version.
However, Griffin disagreed indicating that the continued rule of those who brought us 9/11 would be far more devastating. As it is, the values of the perpetrators of 9/11 are reflected in the lies to justify the attack on Iraq, the disregard for the environment and the Bill of Rights, the criminal negligence both before and after Katrina, and now the apparent plan not only to weaponize space but also to authorize the use of nuclear weapons in a preemptive strike.
*************************************************************************
Comments:
Post a Comment
